arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Software See All Instruments See All Transducers See All Vibration Testing Equipment See All Electroacoustics See All Acoustic End-of-Line Test Systems See All Academy See All Resource Center See All Applications See All Industries See All Services See All Support See All Our Business See All Our History See All Global Presence
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All Analysis & Simulation Software See All DAQ Software See All Drivers & API See All Utility See All Vibration Control See All High Precision and Calibration Systems See All DAQ Systems See All S&V Hand-held Devices See All Industrial Electronics See All Power Analyzer See All S&V Signal Conditioner See All Acoustic Transducers See All Current and Voltage Sensors See All Displacement Sensors See All Force Sensors See All Load Cells See All Multi Component Sensors See All Pressure Sensors See All Strain Sensors See All Strain Gauges See All Temperature Sensors See All Tilt Sensors See All Torque Sensors See All Vibration See All Accessories for Vibration Testing Equipment See All Vibration Controllers See All Measurement Exciters See All Modal Exciters See All Power Amplifiers See All LDS Shaker Systems See All Test Solutions See All Actuators See All Combustion Engines See All Durability See All eDrive See All Production Testing Sensors See All Transmission & Gearboxes See All Turbo Charger See All Training Courses See All Acoustics See All Asset & Process Monitoring See All Custom Sensors See All Durability & Fatigue See All Electric Power Testing See All NVH See All Reliability See All Vibration See All Weighing See All Automotive & Ground Transportation See All Calibration See All Installation, Maintenance & Repair See All Support Brüel & Kjær See All Release Notes See All Compliance
arrow_back_ios

Main Menu

See All nCode - Durability and Fatigue Analysis See All ReliaSoft - Reliability Analysis and Management See All API See All Experimental Testing See All Electroacoustics See All Noise Source Identification See All Environmental Noise See All Sound Power and Sound Pressure See All Noise Certification See All Industrial Process Control See All Structural Health Monitoring See All Electrical Devices Testing See All Electrical Systems Testing See All Grid Testing See All High-Voltage Testing See All Vibration Testing with Electrodynamic Shakers See All Structural Dynamics See All Machine Analysis and Diagnostics See All Dynamic Weighing See All Vehicle Electrification See All Calibration Services for Transducers See All Calibration Services for Handheld Instruments See All Calibration Services for Instruments & DAQ See All On-Site Calibration See All Resources See All Software License Management

Measuring Vibration Characteristics in Seating

A long commute is often stressful and tiring, so comfortable seating becomes increasingly important for drivers as well as passengers. But how do we test the overall comfort quality of seats?

A comfortable and pleasant ride is an important factor for drivers and passengers alike when they decide which vehicle to buy. Vibration induced by powertrain, ancillaries and road can dramatically affect how passengers judge the quality of the ride. The design of a comfortable seat is, therefore, paramount, as it is a means of reducing the vibration excitation affecting drivers and passengers. In order to efficiently evaluate seats in terms of vibration ride, an objective algorithm that can predict the subjective perception of seat vibration is required.

Many studies have been done to predict the subjective perception of riding vibration comfort. ISO 2631 is the most often used standard for this purpose. The relevant studies and standards are based only on the estimation of vibration energy with a frequency weighting function applied and often do not take into account the amount of temporal variation. In collaboration with Toyota, two subjective experiments for seat vibration quality were conducted on road as well as in Brüel & Kjær’s full vehicle NVH simulator. While the on-road subjective assessment provides more realistic ratings of seat vibration quality, it is not cost-effective and does not provide the subjects with the possibility of back-to-back comparisons, that is, comparing two or more different seats, one after another, within the same experimental session.

The current joint investigation proposed an algorithm called ‘Vibration Roughness’ correlating with overall subjective pleasantness by considering the temporal variation of vibration signals together with the overall vibration energy. Vibration Roughness explained our subjective data better than the traditional metrics using only vibration energy, and the predicted results were less affected by the sensor locations and directions.

> Read the full white paper here